Over on a different forum, someone said that my signature was insulting to women (the womanizer thing). Is it? I'm confused. It's not like Maddwg lies about it. He doesn't promise to marry women before he um....sings to 'em. (After all he and they are pixels, singing is it). It's not like he forces himself on women, he justs takes advantage of those willing to be taken advatage of. A womanizer. The guy on the other forum must think womanizer equals forcing women, which of course is ludicruous.
Here is what i was thinking when I created it.
Paladin - He is because being a paladin in UO is a skill, just like cooking.
Drunkard (another insult, to alcoholics don't ya know) - Maddwg drinks and admits it. He'll share too. Is this an insult? How so?
Womanizer - he likes the women. Especially the pixel kind. Doesn't lie about it. Is this an insult? Degrading? I'm confused.
Maddwg drinks, shares a drink if their willing and sings to 'em.
Raconteur - career choice.
Does my signature bother you in any way? I'm not trying to start trouble. I want to hear you honest opnion. After all, Maddwg would have a hard time with the ladies if he was insulting them now wouldn't he?
Hopefully, I didn't bore you to death for a second there.
Me--I ain't a paladin, I'm a systems administrator.
Drunkard - no, I'll have a drink once in a while.
Womaizer? been married to the same woman since 1982, never cheated, never will.
Raconteur - I would like to think so.
Okay, please tell me if you think the sig is degrading or insulting.
Thanks











